I went into the April midnight screening of The Rocky Horror Picture Show almost entirely cold. Besides the vague memory of red lips on the film poster and possibly one of a man in gold briefs, I was effectively a true Rocky Horror “virgin,” a term used by fans of the film referring to people who had not seen a shadow cast before, when I walked in. And so, as is true for any cult, this made me a prime target for indoctrination.
Before the screening, when the MC asked the crowd how many times they had gone to this event to liven the audience, I chose to expose myself as a Rocky Horror “virgin,” partially owing to my naivety and partially for the purposes of writing about this experience. Of this "virgin" group, a couple of us were chosen to come to the stage. Thankfully, I was not one of them, so I was able to observe from the comfort of my seat, protected from potential embarrassment by the crowd around me. By the time the MC told these “virgins” turn around and bend over, I knew I was lucky not to get called over. At least this time anyways, as a true “virgin.”
Based on my experience with The Room, the only other midnight screening I’ve attended to date, I expected to to be a spectator of Rocky Horror, in the way that The Room devotees have built a ritual out of sharing in the experience of gawking at the transcendent awfulness of Tommy Wiseau’s masterpiece. However, as Roger Ebert writes in his 1975 review of the film, The Rocky Horror Picture Show is not so much a movie as more of a long-running social phenomenon.” Rocky Horror has some solid songs and is enjoyable enough as a campy ‘70s artifact, but the film isn’t especially good or bad or even that memorable, and during the screening, I wasn’t sure whether part of Rocky Horror’s appeal was a long-running inside joke of bringing this much fanaticism to something so fundamentally disposable. It is perhaps unnecessary to summarize the plot of Rocky Horror, or as was my experience, even to hear key scenes from the film.
Beyond the shouting at the screen requisite for midnight cult classics like The Room, Rocky Horror is a fully interactive experience. Fans dressed in Rocky Horror costumes come up to the screen, glowsticks and toilet paper fly at the audience, and certain members of the shadow cast come up to you and crush your lap. While the film is a significant aspect of the experience, Rocky Horror is essentially an excuse to dress up in outlandish costumes and violate the sanctity of the cinema experience.
Though the Rocky Horror experience seems to be designed primarily with fun and stimulation overload in mind, it is also important to note how it also functions as a safe space: for people of all races, body types, gender expressions, and sexualities (although I would advise against people under the age of maybe 15 from joining).
Transylvanian Nipple Productions, the shadow cast at the screening I attended at Ritz on the Bourse in Philadelphia, seemed to be a relatively inclusive community, and to make a point of avoiding pronouns based on assumed gender identity while calling on audience members. And though the cast encouraged audience members to dress in Rocky Horror-inspired costumes, the winner of the costume contest was dressed as Ziggy Stardust-era David Bowie—an iconic figure for queer representation in popular culture. Even as a newcomer to Rocky Horror, it appeared like people of all backgrounds were comfortable at the screening.
This aspect of the Rocky Horror phenomenon might seem less meaningful today than when it was released in 1975, as nerd culture, and to some extent, LGBTQ culture, have gradually been embraced by the mainstream. For instance, witness “The Rocky Horror Glee Show,” an episode from the second season of Glee featuring TV-14 covers of Rocky Horror songs that aired at the height of that series’ ratings and cultural impact. At least for its first few seasons, Glee was also one of the top rated Nielsen programs on broadcast television while featuring notable LGBTQ characters and issues, and while centering on self-described outsiders. It could also be argued that the Internet and widely accessible streaming services have supplanted the cinema as a way of connecting to people with common pop culture tastes, and particularly for young queer audiences who might have once turned to such spaces for community.
Regardless, these midnight screenings are still a valuable tradition to maintain. Even at this point, now that the rituals of Rocky Horror screenings have become fully codified, there is still something fundamentally strange about the experience. I might not yet be fully converted to the cause, but I would be happy to go again, maybe this time as a born-again virgin.
More in Horror Reviews
There are three things you should never do in a Damian McCarthy movie: Accept an odd job offer, touch an antique object, and most importantly, never go into a building that seems even remotely interesting. Damian McCarthy, the Irish horror director behind Caveat (2020), Oddity (2024), and Hokum (2026), has a very special talent for constructing physical spaces that feel fundamentally wrong. Watching his three movies provides a vivid illustration of how McCarthy has grown as a director and how he has mastered the art of the haunted house.
If you asked most people a few years ago who was “winning” indie horror, the answer would've been obvious: A24, of course. But between 2021 and now, something shifted. Not all at once and not always clearly, but deliberately. While A24 horror started to feel scattered, Neon built something more strategic.
What’s interesting is that Neon didn’t start with a clear horror identity at all. It was built over time, and I track that evolution in three distinct pseudo-phases: pre-Titane, post-Titane, and post-Longlegs. Each phase had a different strategy. First it was discovering talent, then experimenting with identity, and finally scaling into something that looks a lot like dominance.
15 years ago today, Daren Aronofsky’s psychological thriller Black Swan hit theaters for the first time. The film was seen as a return to form for the director, bringing back much of the neurotic style that his infamous 2000 film Requiem for a Dream had–now dressed in the suffocating clothes of ballet instead of drug induced paranoia. In the time between these two films, Aronofsky released the oddball sci-fi film The Fountain (2006) to mixed reviews, and the quiet and candid The Wrestler (2008) to slightly better reception. Both of these films were a stark departure from Aronofsky’s Requiem for a Dream and Aronofsky’s affinity for reveling in his audience's misery. Now 15 years since its release, Black Swan has seen continued life in the misguided discourses of social media comment sections. Before I critique these discourses however, I would like to critically discuss the film detached from its legacy and reception.
I didn’t like The Substance at first, likely because I was trying to avoid the reality that most women, indeed, are victims. That conversations around women’s bodies go beyond mere comments or jokes—they compose our being. They dictate how long others deem us worthwhile partners or employees. They tell us to spend our New Year’s at the gym instead of with our families. To spend that extra minute dawdling in front of the bathroom mirror. To gawk when we see a woman over 60 on our movie screen. And that no matter how good at your job you are, everyone is talking about your boobs.
I first argue for extending the class of common constructs for analyzing horror media to two more constructs: constraints and character responses. I then analyze horror films belonging to the Fourth Cinema, i.e. Indigenous cinema as described by Barry Barclay. I plan to argue that these films have a distinct conceptualization of these three constructs that stems from ideas about community.
There are few villains in cinema more iconic than Michael Myers. From his misshapen William Shatner mask to his trademark kitchen knife, mere suggestions of these images are enough to send chills down the spines of generations of Americans, even for those who haven’t seen the Halloween films. I’ll be honest with you from the start: I don’t like Halloween very much, but give me a chance to explain.
This visually striking film isn’t as scary as the trailers make it out to be, but instead it is a story about family bond, the history and importance of the black community in filmmaking, and of course, alien invasion.
Fresh has all the ingredients to be the perfect modern thriller. It’s a black comedy about the horrors of modern dating starring Daisy Edgar-Jones and Sebastian Stan. There are plenty of mundane horrors to be had in the dating world, but Fresh ups the stakes and throws a cannibal into the dating pool.
Only the Scream franchise would introduce the word “re-quel” – a term so cinematically dense – into its already meta screenplay and premise. I expect nothing less from a series that has psycho-analyzed the totality of the horror genre while simultaneously creating its own expansive, trope-filled storyline. And in an age of tired reboots and sequels of once original and groundbreaking cinema, you would think that the new Scream would be equally as tired, especially with the franchise being in the state it was in prior to this installment. But 2022’s Scream proudly proclaims that this reboot is exactly what the franchise needed.
Of all the movies you’ve ever seen, how many of them can you specifically remember? Not just when and where you saw them, but who you were with, maybe even where you were sitting and what you chose to eat. For me there’s a lot of nostalgia tied up with doing this. I remember my life changing as a four year old being taken to see Star Wars in 1977 by my dad, as a special afternoon treat away from the hospital where I was undergoing long-term treatment for a collapsed lung.
Last Night in Soho, a film directed by British filmmaker Edgar Wright, lives in between the 1960s and modern times in London, England. Starring staples of British stardom Anya-Taylor Joy (Sandie), Matt Smith (Jack), briefly Sam Claflin (Lindsey), and Thomasin McKenzie (Eloise/Ellie), this film follows the life of Eloise Turner, a young aspiring fashion designer with an infatuation with the swinging sixties of London as she navigates her extraordinary ability to body-jump into another young woman in her dreams.
When I was a kid, I used to lose myself in the Fighting Fantasy ‘choose your own adventure’ books. I’d map out the best paths through the story, making copious notes on optimal outcomes with deadly creatures trying to cut my reading short and my limbs shorter. I’d play along with dice, and unlike my reckless friends, try not to skip ahead to see if my choices were the right ones. If I died, I started over, and there was a tremendous sense of achievement in being able to successfully remember how to get to the end with one’s life intact.
What is the recipe for success for a half-hour comedy these days? Apparently, it's to take a beloved New Zealand mockumentary about vampires and adapt it to American television.
What We Do in the Shadows, helmed by Oscar-winning Taika Watiti and Jermaine Clement of the original 2014 film of the same name, is a vampire-centric mockumentary-style show entering its third season. For those unfamiliar with the show, the main premise is that a group of centuries-old vampires emigrate to Staten Island from Europe, hoping to conquer the New World, but end up just being roommates in a dilapidated manor, getting into weekly shenanigans.
Not a fan of horror? Well, this is the perfect ghost-themed show for you. Full disclosure: I hate horror movies. Whether it’s because of the jump-scares, eerie music or avoidable bad choices made by the protagonist, horror movies have never been my style. I have, however, always been fascinated by the idea of spirits and ghosts and can’t help but ask the same question whenever I watch a horror movie: what happens to all the normal people who die? Are all ghosts really vengeful spirits or creepy kids?
I Blame Society is a terrifyingly brilliant satirical film that touches upon many important issues of our time: sexism, art, crime, and Hollywood disillusion. Directed by Gillian Horvat & co-written by herself and Chase Williamson, the semi-fictional story follows ‘Gillian’ (a semi-fictional character played by Horvat herself), as she works on a film based on a semi-compliment from a few of her friends that she would make a good murderer. Frustrated by the constant rejection and belittling of her talent, Gillian decides to take the film to the finish line completely on her own, exploring how far her character can go in planning murders, while taking a camera with her wherever she goes no matter how her friends or boyfriend feel about it.
